Comments on: 28 Days Later

By: HisPapa

HisPapa — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:07:14 +0000

they are infected with rage, and are not the undead,,
so i dont think they are zombies,,
but does it really matter,,
its just a diffrent way of telling the same story..the infection of mankind.

By: Pilot

Pilot — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:08:16 +0000

It’s considered as one only by its viewers, but, possibly, the directors don’t.

By: Mr.Fuz

Mr.Fuz — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:37:03 +0000

pretty much any movie were people chase down people and infect/eat them is considered a zombie movie nowadays

By: Pilot

Pilot — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:57:47 +0000

Thanks zombiefan for recommending. I’ll be sure to check it out.

By: zombiefan

zombiefan — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:37:12 +0000

that’s nice british movie, i think you should take a look at another movie from brits – it’s called Dead Set, i didn’t find it on this site, but sure it should be described here. pretty awesome for a zombiefan, ya know

By: Panimu

Panimu — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:39:26 +0000

Just because these zombies are different to other zombies (i.e. not freaking magic perpetual motion machines) doesn’t make them not zombies.

By: Pilot

Pilot — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:48:59 +0000

Well, the idea is still pretty much meant that the infected ARE the zombies.

By: zombiebear

zombiebear — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:09:06 +0000

NOT A ZOMBIE FILM THE INFECTED ARE SICKOS ZOMBIES CANT DIE FROM STARVATION BUT IT WAS A GOOD FLICK LOTS OF TERROR I OWN IT.