Comments on: 28 Days Later

By: AskariXable

AskariXable — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:53:53 +0000

Agent G that is so TRUE! What more can I add,lol! I bow to you and salute you good sir!

By: Warkill

Warkill — Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:26:29 +0000

@Agent G well im with you but even real zombies should have a small chance to kinda “run” or hobble or some crap, like newly turned humans, exept the old ones might excited or some crap try to run and have there legs crack open and break into peices as they run. lol. i dunno but slow zombies are much better in my opinion.

By: Agent G

Agent G — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:54:06 +0000

28 Days Later is not a zombie movie! The Infected, as they are called, are still alive. They are infected with a virus that causes hemorrhaging, hematomas, increases adrenaline and hormone production and basically drives them insane, as the scientist at the beginning of the movie says: they are infected with rage. Would you call the infected in the Crazies (ironically written by George Romero, Grandfather of zombie movies) are zombies? Of course, they are not. The infected in 28 days later are alive. If you shoot them in the chest they go down, they can run meaning they probably are not dead, and they can starve to death. The undead, living dead and zombies cannot starve, as they do not actually need food. And when you shoot a zombie in the chest it really doesn’t stop it. On top of that, if anyone watches the commentary or interviews on the DVD, the writer explains the infected as still being human and still being alive. I know the fact that they run does not really prove they are not zombies because nowadays there are the mutant zombies that can run because whatever caused them to come back to life reanimated their cells (like the T-Virus or whatever mutates them in Left 4 Dead). However, I agree with George Romero, dead things cannot run. If they did, their ankles would snap, decay and rigor mortis prevent the reanimated from running.

By: Óli

Óli — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:39:57 +0000

Best zombie movie ever.

By: HisPapa

HisPapa — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:07:14 +0000

they are infected with rage, and are not the undead,,
so i dont think they are zombies,,
but does it really matter,,
its just a diffrent way of telling the same story..the infection of mankind.

By: Pilot

Pilot — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:08:16 +0000

It’s considered as one only by its viewers, but, possibly, the directors don’t.

By: Mr.Fuz

Mr.Fuz — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:37:03 +0000

pretty much any movie were people chase down people and infect/eat them is considered a zombie movie nowadays

By: Pilot

Pilot — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:57:47 +0000

Thanks zombiefan for recommending. I’ll be sure to check it out.

By: zombiefan

zombiefan — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:37:12 +0000

that’s nice british movie, i think you should take a look at another movie from brits – it’s called Dead Set, i didn’t find it on this site, but sure it should be described here. pretty awesome for a zombiefan, ya know

By: Panimu

Panimu — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:39:26 +0000

Just because these zombies are different to other zombies (i.e. not freaking magic perpetual motion machines) doesn’t make them not zombies.